Projected Energy Saving And Carbon Reduction Opportunities From Using The Dyson Airblade

dyson-airblade-ab03Most organisations have multiple bathrooms where they provide employees with hand-drying facilities in the form of either paper towels or an electric hand dryer, or sometimes both.

Recently I was asked to quantify the energy saving and carbon reduction opportunity from switching a traditional hand-drying facility for the Dyson Airblade hand dryer.

In this article I set out the potential energy, cost and carbon savings from using a Dyson Airblade hand dryer as opposed to paper towels or traditional electric hand-dryers.

Calculation assumptions

To make the calculations below I have used the following assumptions:

  • Power costs of £0.1085/kWh
  • 0.584 kg CO2 generated for each kWh used

hand-dryerPower consumption, cost and carbon emissions from 2 traditional electric hand dryers

Based on a fair assumption that a traditional electric hand dryer uses 20 watts of power per use (30 second drying time), then the total annual consumption would be 1,760 kWh (20 watts x 200 uses a day = 4kWh x 2 dryers x 220 work days = 1,760 kWh).

This translates to annually operating cost of £191 (1,760 kWh x £0.1085/kWh) and carbon emissions of 1,028 kg CO2 (1,760 kWh x 0.584 kg/kWh).

paper-towelsOperating cost and carbon emissions from using paper towels

Based on the assumption that a bathroom is used 200 times a day and that the average person uses 2 paper towels per bathroom visit, then the total daily consumption of paper towels would be 400.

Assuming an average cost of £0.01 per towel, the total annual cost would be £880 (400 x £0.01 x 220 work days) and the total carbon emission would be 352 kg CO2 (400 x 220 work days x 0.004 kg CO2 generated per towel use)

dyson-airblade-white-ab03Power consumption, cost and carbon emissions from 2 Dyson Airblade hand dryers

Based on a fair assumption that a Dyson Airblade hand dryer uses 4.5 watts of power per use (10 second drying time), then the total annual consumption would be 396 kWh (4.5 watts x 200 uses a day = 0.9kWh x 2 dryers x 220 work days = 396 kWh).

This translates to annually operating cost of £43 (396 kWh x £0.1085/kWh) and carbon emissions of 232 kg CO2 (396 kWh x 0.584 kg/kWh).

Total savings compared to a traditional electric hand dryer = £148 per year and 796 kg per year

Total savings compared to paper towels = £837 per year and 120 kg per year

The average cost and payback of a Dyson Airblade hand dryer

The leading Dyson hand dryer is the Dyson AirBlade AB07

Significant savings can be made if you purchase in bulk (i.e. more than 10 units).

Assuming you go for the AB07 and purchase 2 units, it would take approx. 9 years to payback on a traditional hand dryer and 2 years to payback on paper towels.

Obviously the more units you buy the greater the economies of scale and the shorter the payback period. I would recommend using the assumptions above to calculate the potential cost and carbon savings from installing more than 2 units, if you have multiple bathrooms.

Recommended Reading
A brilliant autobioghraphray by one of the greatest inventors of the 20th century. A true rags to riches story about self belief and optimism in the face of adversity. Against the Odds: An Autobiography

About the Author Staff Writer

Our writers come from all over the world, but one thing unites them - their passion for sustainability.

Leave a Comment:

2 comments
Clemens Li says November 22, 2019

I still do not know the actual power consumption of the dyson air blade.
4.5 Watts per 10 seconds equals 1650 Watts/hour.
As a weak hair dryer consumes more I just don’t believe.

Reply
Haris Umair says April 3, 2020

Late last year, Dyson, Inc. commissioned a study with MIT to estimate the greenhouse gas emissions over the life cycle of their hand dryers as compared to cotton towels, paper towels, and standard warm air dryers. According to the study, paper towels do outperform standard warm air dryers. Due to the increased efficiency during the “use phase” of the product life cycle, the study claims Dyson dryers outperform all alternative options.

Reply
Add Your Reply